English中文首页
← Practice resources

The topic library · September 1–14, 2026

A world of ideas.
Find yours.

Unusual discoveries. Everyday systems. Questions with consequences. Explore a story, follow its sources, and find something worth explaining.

Illustrated books, questions and learning tools100 stories to explore

One story. One page. The numbers 1–100 are stable chronological page identifiers. The ranking is separate: every story is scored across the coaching lenses and assigned a rank within this 100-story library.

Each page gives you a factual starting point, evidence limits, and ways to develop an expository or original-oratory speech for students 8–16. Change the lens below to see what rises to the top.

Jump to a story · 1–100

Read. Question. Explain.

Choose a story.

100 stories · September 1–14

Sorted by overall rank. Page numbers stay stable when you explore a different lens. Scores are coaching judgments.

Education & society · 03 September

Overall rank #47 · page 22

Indonesia investigates illnesses after school meals

September reports described illnesses among students and teachers after meals supplied through Indonesia's free-school-meal programme, with different reports citing different groupings and totals.

A headline is a starting point.

For expository

Make a mechanism understandable. Define the important terms, show how the parts connect, and explain what the evidence can establish.

For original oratory

Develop your own idea. Use the topic's evidence, test the strongest objection, and keep the conclusion proportionate to what is known.

For careful reading

Each page separates the news from its limits. A proposal is not an enacted rule, a forecast is not an outcome, and one case is not proof of a general trend.

About this collection and the rankings

Ten domain researchers assembled 135 candidates. Review passes covered explanation, original oratory, reasoning and societal impact, age suitability, and evidence. Duplicate reports were consolidated. This is a snapshot through September 14, 2026; a September publication may describe an earlier event, which is identified on the page.

All 100 stories receive competition-lens scores and ranks for overall potential, expository potential, original-oratory potential, logic and impact, and unusualness and impact. The lenses use coaching judgments, not official tournament rules or predictions of winning. Ties follow the deterministic ordering in the research data; page numbers remain stable.

  • OverallSocietal impact 20% · Weirdness 10% · Accessibility 10% · Expository 20% · Original oratory 20% · Logic & impact 20%
  • ExpositorySocietal impact 10% · Weirdness 5% · Accessibility 20% · Expository 40% · Logic & impact 25%
  • Original oratorySocietal impact 20% · Weirdness 10% · Accessibility 5% · Original oratory 40% · Logic & impact 25%
  • Logic & impactSocietal impact 35% · Accessibility 10% · Expository 5% · Original oratory 5% · Logic & impact 45%
  • Unusualness & impactSocietal impact 35% · Weirdness 45% · Accessibility 5% · Expository 5% · Original oratory 5% · Logic & impact 5%

Age guidance depends on context. Sensitive topics retain older age guidance. Students never need to disclose personal medical, family or traumatic experiences.

Illustrations are conceptual artwork, not photographs or reconstructions of the reported events. Sources are linked on each page. Some source access could not be repeated; those limits are noted. Publication reports, company claims and preliminary findings remain attributed.